Group Members: Jayden/Charles/John/Crystal

Automated Law Enforcement

Do we accept robots and security personal as moving electronics that are controlled remotely

Perception and views on the issue

• My view on the issue is that having programmed police authorities will have a big impact on the society and governments community such as technology ruling over human life forms. think of a computer or phone telling you what to do but it being the law and rules. then electronic discipline will be intact.
• My view on the issue is that Robots produce more accurate and high quality work. And they can work at a constant speed without taking breaks.
• My view on the issue is that the robots would be more effective than human law enforcement because they wouldn't need to be paid or take days off and the robots couldn't be bribed into letting criminals go and they would be biased and fair and they could be kept stupid enough to be controlled by humans.

Summary On The Trouble Of Robots Functions

One of the most important fact about law enforcement is that robots in particular have trouble through police policies more than a normal officer would such as the solution can critical through hostage situations such as the droid does not function like a human and will not proceed with the problem  carefully and lead to a disaster such as when a robot trys to calm a situation by  negotiating with a person he may not connect with the human to stand down and surrender.

And yes a robot does not simply function as well as a human a robot cannot over power a pure humans mind and overcome challenges that only a human can through law enforcement eg: Follow orders well and waste resources more quickly (FUEL and WEAPONRY) but a law enforced robot can have particular ways to help more in a more user friendly way.

Robots may not be able to sum up conflict well with other human beings to keep order.

Programmed robots will be extremely difficult depending on the robots functions and what its particular meant to do.

The robot may malfunction through difficulties it may be simular to a officer with medication problems but officers do not do drugs which means  robots have extreme problems when broken or in minor damage conditions Eg: they may age through function and brake momentarily and whats more is that they may fail to function in a minor situation when holding people up and arresting them or watching guard and lets face it robots who keep guard are at a major risk.

People are able to disable them (experts at hacking or programming) or convert them to aid in criminal activity which government technology is used against them. Unlike humans who continues their duties at a pace suitable throughout the task given. Robot security's may side track and be off their guard.

Why Robots can be a asset towards law enforcement

So we all know robots sounds cool as it sounds and yes we don't have to pay them for their time all past police officers don't have to work overtime or spend hours working day and night 24/7 at the station or streets driving around.

Robots are more motivative towards their job and do not hate it eg: when a robot is on a long shift they do not get bored half way through it. A police officer sometimes requires regular breaks like lunch and rest breaks unlike a robot the only breaks that are possible is refueling for more hours on on the job.

A robot can expand quickly but not as great as a human but allows fast time of gaining the information to help in law enforcement career. it allows fast time of producing a robots mind to help in precise task given. Robots can handle conflict situations more effectively and carefully.

   Advantages and disadvantages